Revisão sistemática sobre gestão do lazer

Abstract

This study aims to present a systematic review of scientific production involving leisure management. To this end, the research, of a qualitative nature, was developed through a systematic review in the scientific databases Scielo, Lilacs and Portal CAPES of journals. The results were divided into 4 analysis categories. Three incidents were found in the Scielo database, 16 incidents in Lilacs and 20 incidents in the CAPES journal portal, totaling 39 productions. After adopting the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 26 articles were considered for analysis. The results related to Category 1) Main Characteristics, indicated that the publications were predominantly qualitative, carried out from 1994 to 2021, with a greater incidence in the years 2016 and 2018. Among the 26 articles analyzed, 14 of them discussed leisure management in municipalities, with emphasis on actions, programs and projects. The scientific periodicals Motrivivência -Revista de Educação Física, Esporte e Lazer and Licere - Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação Interdisciplinar em Estudos do Lazer, were the ones that published the most on this topic. In relation to Category 2) Spaces, Equipment, Programs and Projects, it was possible to verify that among the 26 articles, 06 focused on the discussion on the management of leisure spaces and equipment and 04 of them, on municipal and state leisure programs and projects. As for Category 3) Knowledge Management and Scientific Production on Public Policies, 06 articles, among the 26 analyzed, dealt with these themes. Among them, the articles highlighted research groups and study centers on sports and leisure policy and management, collaborative culture in management processes, and practices involving knowledge and information management. Category 4) General Reflections on Management and Public Policies included 10 articles with varied themes. In this category, it was possible to observe that the majority of articles highlighted topics related to financial management, expenses and financing. Other contents were discussed in the articles, such as the importance of rethinking management and management modernization programs, intersectoral actions and different scenarios involving management, including participatory public policy. It can be observed among the majority of the articles analyzed, the greater focus given to the management of municipal programs and projects in the field of leisure, in which they analyze spaces and equipment, and distance themselves from the true meaning of Public Leisure Policy, in recognizing the leisure as a social right. In this sense, it is necessary to carry out new studies involving leisure management, in order to guarantee continuity in debates on this topic.